The Anderson Institute Logo 
   Where history is becoming an experimental science      
Innovation and Excellence in Time Technology The Official Site of the World Encyclopedia of Time, the Time Shop, and the Time Research Association.    
  Home  |  About Us  |  Educational Resources  |  Encyclopedia  |  The Time Shop  |  Time Research Association  |  Contact Us

Trans-dimensional Unified Field Theory

A theory that advances the unification of relativity with quantum mechanics and string theory.

Written by: George James Ducas


Trans-dimensional unified field theory by George James Ducas
Click here to read the entire
by George James Ducas
Our universe is a multidimensional universe where processes and procedures involving natura physics relate and exist simultaneously in multiple dimensions. Natural occurrences are multidimensional. Historically we identify our existence within three dimensions or vectors of space. However, the matrix of space needs to be redefined as a periodic table of "components" or "vectors" which build up space-time and relate all physics within the relationship of space "component vectors" and "component matrixes". For simplification these components will be called "components or vectors", not to be understood as our modern use of the term energy. The basic building blocks of space "vectors" are velocity (V), time (T), and dimension (D), which will also be defined later as superstrings. Each represents a separate vector or component, the basic of these components is D or dimension, and from this all the relationships of physics are established by its combination with velocity and time, and multiplications of said components.

This theory proposes to unite all of physics within a unified field of mathematical relationships,
building on the components of velocity, time, and dimension. When these components are
combined in various dimensional states, they form the more complex systems of natural
occurring phenomena of physics. Hence, the Universe is defined by Trans Dimensional Unified
Field Theory, where components can be explained in terms of mathematical relationships to the
same or other components, and its action and existence acts simultaneously in different
dimensional planes.

The composition of the natural order of this universe is founded upon on basic vectors VT or
components that are repeatedly added or better “multiplied” in each dimension D^N and
properties altered by such combinations. A single alteration or multiplication of VT to a higher
dimension is a minute step that increases the degree of complexity of the properties of that
combination or dimension. This will be explained and expressed below by a periodic table of
composition. Evolution in complexity of components and dimensions is the nature of
the dynamic universe, and also in the basic structure of space. The philosophy of composition
from basic elements to complexity is a universal principle.

The rules of a Trans Dimensional Unified Field Universe are as follows:

1.) Basic components (superstrings) or vectors are combined and properties altered in steps
to form simple to more complex systems by multiplying a VT to each successive and
higher dimension. This is one of the periodicities of this theory. VT or D is the “thing”
that everything is made from. If there is a God particle, it is superstring D.

2.) All naturally occurring phenomenon and components is representative of basic
mathematical relationships that are connected via unified field of physics-mathematics.

3.) All natural phenomena and components in the construct of space-time are related and can
be explained mathematically.

4.) The universe is a multi-dimensional world where processes can be studied and viewed
simultaneously in space-time.

5.) All dimensions exist in stability, and hence their effects are experienced as naturally
occurring events.

6.) Space and matter are symbiotic, additive, and stable, where one coexists with the other.
Space is proportionately related to matter by the cube root. So to divide the matter nearly
doubles the space by proportion. Matter generates a force. Space generates a force.
Matter creates space. Space creates matter.

7.) C is a limiting factor for all dimensional relationships and represents balance in the
universe. C represents the elastic collision of D^3. Space is an elastic superconductor.

8.) An expanding universe suggests the "big bang" or creation is still in process. An
expanding universe is explained by space as components created or related to matter.

9.) The universe is a mechanical process analogous to cellular growth where divisions in
matter accelerate the expansion of the universe.

10.) A dimension is so by reference to another and including something of the other. In the
case of the theory I propose a dimension is tied to another by relationship or mathematics,
and in this case, by a defined order or set of rules. Basic superstrings V, T, and D are
multiplied dimension per dimension and create varied properties from simplicity (low
energy and dimension) to complexity (high energy and dimension).

The Periodic Table of the Universe Energies and Dimensional Relationships

D^1 = VT: Dimension 1 represents a vector of velocity and a vector of time working together in
complementary balance or polarity. As demonstrated in relative physics, velocity is inversely
proportional to time, with the constant C or the speed of light as the limiting factor. So as time
increases, velocity diminishes. Time is a polar velocity. The basic building elements of the
universe are the constant C for velocity of light and D. Space (D^3 in 3 dimensions) constitutes
the building block of all elements, components, and matrixes. Hence D^1 = CT.

By space I mean space as several applications, D^1 is space in dimension 1, D^2 are space as
area and D^3 are volumetric space. Space D^3 is a limited extent in 1, 2 or 3 dimensions. To
understand these dimensions 1 through to 3, you have to know that in each a component of VT is
multiplied. The addition of these components vastly changes the nature of the resultant, yet, it is
possible to understand the most complex components in terms if the simplest working back
through the dimensions. This unified theory takes you from simplicity to complexity in 23 steps,
and in doing so; you never really get away from the simple while explaining the complex. That
makes it all the more challenge in understanding all the steps and what is suggested. Just as revolutionary as E=MC^2, is D^5=MC^2, or M=D^3T^2, so mass is explained as volume, time,
velocity, going up in dimensions we see mass related to electricity, and a whole host of
subatomic nuclear events. These components and their relationships, although invisible, create
the particles that we see.

D^10 is gravity as volume, which induces by rotational motion D^7 gravity as density, which
also I might add is related to the force of an object in D^4. D^10 induces D^7, so then I
interpreted circular (area) motion of an electron in a helical orbit to generate gravity. The task is
in the interpretation. The qualities if Gravity extend to a black hole in D^20 where gravity is
squared (G^2). It may be that the highest dimension is D^21 where the Force of E^4 is

Also remember that as we add VT to each dimension, new units need to be created. Take for
Example D/T=V. We know that Distance/Time = Velocity. Now M = D^3*T^2. If I only knew
D and T, what is to tell me what the combinations of those are, namely M is mass? So you see, as
we progress up the scale, it will be a discovery to create new units, because by each dimension
up, the nature of the dimension changes drastically the properties of that dimension, even to the
point at first glance you might say, they are not related, but they are. And by the discovery that
they are, the true physics emerges, and understanding of how the most remote concepts and
phenomena are connected.

The analogy of the atom (neutron, proton, electron, three parts in one) is to show D as neutral. D
is space in one dimension, and in three dimensions D is volumetric space. I would go on to
describe space as any combination of powers of D such as vector (D), area (D^2), and volume
(D^3) and continuing up. Just as I describe gravity as vector, area, and volume, which is the
same as a gravitational vector (force), area, and volume, I can do so for other concepts. As we
know, space, time, and velocity are all related, and at the most basic level, they are connected.
As a concept I imagine D=CT, where T can be converted to D multiplied by constant C. So D
and T are equivalent just like matter and energy is traditionally viewed. V and T are inversely
proportional, when one increases the other decreases. I like to call that polar, yet acting together.
D and T are different manifestations of the same thing. Very small amounts of time can be
converted to very large amounts of D and vice versa. This is particularly true in hyperspace to be
discussed later.

The relation of V and T means if you have motion, you have time. You can understand the
relationship of these more clearly by the concept of induction by rotation in this theory. The
rotation of T^4 induces T^1. T^4 includes space, so the rotation of D^3 (space) induces T. V^4
induces V^1, V^4=D^3*A/T^2, and interpreted I understand that the rotation and acceleration of
space induces V. So the difference in V and T is solely due to rate of change. In the first instance
its D affected by V to induce time, and in the second it’s D affected by T to induce velocity.
How to see this visually: Well the D particle is neutral and does it incorporate circular motion in
this picture as it appears that everything we see or imagine has this characteristic? Yes! Perhaps
all components are related by rotational motion. Or perhaps this D is a line or a string, spinning
or rotating on itself like a sphere, while inducing T or another line or string like a sphere that is also rotating and produces a third string that is related to the other two which we call V? Yes!

We may have a geometry of 3 intersecting spheres which induces 3 dimensional space in D^3
and is the construction of space, which is similar to the tetrahedral structures used by
Buckminster Fuller. These geometries may subdivide into higher complexity in the higher
dimensions. D^3 dimension may allow both Cartesian and radial geometries by the relationship
of geometries of three combinations of 3 (D^3), which is three combinations of VT (D=VT) or
nine intersecting and rotating strings. D^3 and consecutive dimensions upwards may be fractal
geometries and the geometries of space. D, T, and V are the three basic superstrings, and when
combined in 3 dimensions and also in positive, negative, and neutral results in 27 strings for D^3
in a tetrahedral arrangement. Strings form the construct of space. Space in interference and
packed rotating spherical geometries produces particles.

I would better prefer imagining 2 vectors together VT and the combination of those we call D to
simplify the balance of polar components or polarity and for the sake of simple discussion. Then
I can imagine space more in a Cartesian way rather than spherical, but the geometric
combination of three appears to be tetrahedral and multiple. Their nature may allow various
geometries to superimpose over another.

Meaning of a Dimension

By dimension I mean the VT (Velocity*Time) or powers thereof, not items selected as different
like mass. So D^5=MC^2 means that there are 5 dimensions of VT. Each dimension increases by
a power of VT. The periodicity of the dimensions here is the increase or multiplication of
dimension per dimension, and also as they do, create the complexity of different phenomena we
know, but are all related. There are other periodicities that will be discussed later. When Einstein
said mass and energy are different manifestations of the same “thing”, he did not say what the
"thing" was, but he used the word "thing", which is a half solution and not very scientific. Now I
propose to you that the "thing" is VT (Velocity*Time). Mass and Energy are different
manifestations of V (Velocity) and T (Time). VT is the “thing” from which everything is made.

If Einstein realized this, he would have had his unified field theory. The construct of all that
exists is a manifestation of motion. All dimensions are distance or spatial dimensions. The point
of talking about VT is equivalency. Now you can talk about mass (M) in terms of D, V, and T,
where before you talked about mass as M with its separate and unique units such as kg. In this
theory you can define everything by superstrings V, T, and D, from mass to gravity and beyond.
The point of VT is that it is the multiplier dimension per dimension, and creating vastly different
characteristics as we move up, so much so that upon inspection, they may seem unrelated.

Other equations for D^1 is as follows:

D^1 = A (acceleration)*Density

D^2 =VTVT = V^2 (squared) T^2 (squared): This 2nd dimension represents 2 components of
VT acting in 2 directions as in an area.

D^3 =VTVTVT = V^3 (cubed) T^3 (cubed) = A^3 (acceleration)*Density^3: This represents the
third dimension where we experience movement in three dimensions, with components of velocity and time also in three dimensions. Movement in all directions is allowed by a radial and
spherical tetrahedral space matrix.

D^4 = VTVTVTVT = F = MA = A^3(acceleration)*D*Density^3: The fourth dimension is
represented by VT acting on the third dimension. This VT on the third dimension is essentially a
resultant force. So the fourth dimension is force or forces. This is not to be mistaken with gravity
as naturally occurring phenomena which Newtonian physics has done. D^4=MA, which means
that force is a dimensional property or a space field property. I believe that when 2 more strings
of space are added in three dimensions, you get asymmetry in the field of space which causes the
force to be.

D^5 = VTVTVTVTVT = MV^2 (squared) = E: This is MV^2 (squared) typically identified as
Kinetic Energy, however, I will explain this "MV^2 squared" as a specific scientific relationship,
and the word "components" is now used liberally to replace my word "energies". All elements
within this table are to be considered components. Here we can associate the equation with
MC^2 (squared), but it is a 5 dimensional phenomena. I am exchanging E for D^5 to fifth power,
correcting Einstein if you will. You cannot have a unified field theory by presenting parts. Even
so a theory is an idea that needs to be tested and from it you establish laws. A law would be D^5
to 5th power = MC^2 squared. Let’s use D^5 instead of E. The units are in kg meters and
seconds, when you calculate D it is in meters. C is in meters and seconds. Take the equation
D^5=MC^2 and calculate D for the mass of the sun to measure the extent of D or space vector.

So run the numbers, mass of the sun, speed of light, and you have a distance D near to Neptune’s
orbit. That’s the whole point of the theory, it combines everything in the equations and notice
that in each dimension you add a V and a T, a periodic table, you add dimensional vectors. The
correct equation is D^5 5th power = MV^2 squared, but I use the limit C to determine a
maximum. The fact that one might say the units don't go together is what's puzzling, they do and
the relationships have been redefined. Suffice it to say since everything is a subset of one string
D, the units can all be thrown out and express in magnitude until more accurate labels for units
are derived.

A joule is a force of one Newton moving one meter. In this theory D^4 = MA; so D^5 = D^4
(force) * Distance (meter); so a question about units should now move down to D^4=MA. There
is no mystery then in D^5, but the task is to reevaluate MA or Mass in terms of distance, time,
and velocity, and when you get there, you have the strings that make up all matter and correct
units expressed.

There are three strings that are distance, time, and velocity; these 3 combine to form all space
and all matter, and they are transparent until they superimpose, and the interference patterns of
special superposition are the particles that we see. The relationship of string-dimensions is also
mathematical in inter-dimensional relationships. Particles are the minor portion of reality.

A basic idea of this theory was to reinterpret mass mathematically into more basic component of
space, if it was possible. As you jump from dimension to dimension, the "nature" of the units of
each dimension varies drastically. Then you have the questions surrounding units such as the
joule for D^5, which is a typical and fundamental question of a unified field theory; why does
the "nature" of units vary so much from simplicity to complexity? This is a mystery in physics, but also the same happens similarly in the periodic table of elements though perhaps, as in the
periodic table, instead of addition perhaps multiplication was the ladder to complexity, and the
component was velocity and time, VT (D). So to get to D^4, conceptually I thought of a vector
VT (D) in space D^3, and got D^4=ma. D^5=mv^2 was a naturals step, then came D^5=mc^2.

Distance is in meters and mass in kilograms.

D^6 = F*D^2 (squared) = VTVTVTVTVTVT: force acting over an area is magnetism. As an
electron is moving, the subsequent magnetic field acts over an area.

D^7 = F*D^3 (cubed) = VTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 7th dimension is force acting on the third
dimension, which is gravity density. This is a naturally occurring force.

So for the seventh dimension, an explaining equation will be G (gravity density) = F (force) D^3
(cubed) or F V (volume) = Gravity Density
From FV=G (density) we can determine the F or force of gravity (G density) and volume (V) are
inversely proportional. Hence F is inversely proportional to 1/volume. To understand these
equations correctly, remember that components on the same line of an equation are inversely
proportional and directly proportional when divided.

So if the earth there is a 100 pound person, and we know that Saturn has a gravity/mass 95 times
of earth, and a volume 769 times the earth, from this equation we can calculate the weight of a
man 100 pounds on earth to be 108 on Saturn.
95 inversely proportional to 1/769 = 0.1235
95 inversely proportional to 1/.1235 = 8.0
100 pounds > 108 pounds by the ratio........So the equation has demonstrated the relationship of
volume to gravity, that gravity diminishes in proportion to the volume of a planet when the mass
is constant. By these equations gravity is related to the diameter of the planet, and came up with
the weight of a man on Saturn. Saturn is near the gravity of the earth, and is related by density
and diameter and expressed here as a vector.

Now my gravity equation was arrived at by progression, D^7 = F * Volume (D^3) or
gravitational density, now is this not a more complete understanding of gravity, a naturally
occurring force in space. With that assumption I get a relationship that tells me that gravity is
influenced by volume, mass, acceleration. The current gravity equations need to be rewritten in
terms of observable components, like real entities of physics, not abstract things like radius.

Using radius is like describing atoms in terms of half electrons...and to go further, what about the
connection to electricity, magnetism, and so on. If you don't have a pure or true equation, you'll
never have a unified field theory. You have to eliminate all the abstract shortcuts like radius, but
talk in real terms such as volumes. Now if you run the equations, you find that “gravity density”
for Saturn is approximately 8000 times greater than the earth, attributed to 2 things, the first is
the volume of the planet, and the second is the mass. These 2 variables are density. Small g or a
as I call it A (the component of acceleration) is nearly the same. At D^10 we find the true value for gravity volume or energy, then D^7 becomes the density and D^4 the force. And by ratio we
can establish the relative gravity vectors between planets. But the true nature of gravity is
something much larger and multidimensional, and has a force component in this dimension.

What is true in a larger dimension has a three dimensional shadow and for gravity in this
dimension it is force.

So you ask, how to apply, well this theory will explain the true relationships, from which you can
derive the Newtonian rules of thumb or secondary equations to run comparative analysis. The
equations are connected, and can be, but the understanding of them depends on use. The
equations will reveal avenues of research. I think the gravity equations presented here fully
explain gravity and tell me volume is a component, and mass, and acceleration and how it is
reinterpreted in various dimensions.

The dimensions keep rising in relationship to further complexities

D^8 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 8th dimension is F^2 (squared) which I associate with
mechanical-chemical reactions; or MV^2 (squared) acting on D^3 (cubed) or third dimension.
This could be associated with nuclear forces that hold matter together. Kinetic energy in three
dimensions is also an issue here since it combines D^5 or 5th dimension (MV^2 squared) with
D^3 or third dimension (D cubed).

D^9 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 9th dimension is magnetism D^6 acting on D^3
(cubed) which is related to electricity. This is also E * F or force of energy.

D^10 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: 10th dimension is MV^2 (squared) to an additional
(squared), or E^2 (squared), which could be a nuclear reaction or kinetic nuclear orbital motion.
Associated with this is electromagnetic force or D^4 or fourth dimension acting with D^6 or
sixth dimension (magnetism). This could be electromagnetic force due to orbiting electrons.

What we measure as gravity is what we find useful. I think gravity goes beyond the way it is
understood. I believe that the nature of gravity is different in its various dimensional states.

Gravity has components of mass, acceleration, volume according to this theory, so it is more than
force here. Acting in three dimensions Gravity is E^2. The density component of gravity (D^7) is
8000 times on Saturn than the Earth. The force component is what we know about gravity, which
is very limited. The value of acceleration or what you know as g is nearly the same due to
density. Why does Saturn have so many moons? Could it be that all the moons are because of the
larger component of volumetric gravity in D^10? And such a component would be very large
and far reaching, as gravity is. Perhaps also contributing to its additive strength as mass
accumulates. And also something so large would be far reaching even with an inverse square
law. I did say volumetric gravity is energy squared. E^2 = D^10 = Gravity (D^7) * D^3 (space),
E would be a kinetic linear line or orbit, perhaps E^2 is circular orbital motion along with a
pattern of small circles as in a helical orbit in 3d. So the Energy is acting across an area(s) as it
moves in 3d. What I am trying to explain is that there may be multiple levels in understanding
Gravity. I do believe the understanding of gravity and relationship to electricity has to do with
understanding the orbits of the electrons around a nucleus. When we normally think of a particle,
we think it has components that interact with other particles. So the relationship of particles auses the actions, but what if the relationship of actions results in the particle. Perhaps the
interaction of components or the interface of these is the particle, so opposite to our current
thinking, the actions create the particle rather than the particle creates the actions. So the forces
between the mass creates the particle rather than vice versa. So what is D, well it is a component
that by relationship creates mass or the thing we see. At the most basic level D is T or Time, and
balanced with V. Components balanced or inversely proportional exist together perhaps as
polarity or polar-balanced vector. Opposite sides of a coin is a model. I think of Time as a
velocity in polarity with Velocity, as a balancing counter motion. And Distance nearly the same
as Time, but where the 2 meet or at the border. Time is compressed Distance; D^1 = C*T; Just
like Mass is compressed Energy. Now to jump to a wilder thought, maybe each D dimension is a
particle or at least particles may be linked to these equations somehow as interfaces. I don’t
claim to be absolutely correct, but I believe I am asking the right questions.

D^7 = Space (D^3) * Force (D^4).........or mass*acceleration* D^3. So you have a factor of
density in gravity. Gravity at this level is a vector, interpreting force as a vector. Here force and
volume are inversely proportional as mentioned before.

D^10 = Gravity* D^3 is volumetric and could be in consideration of gravity beyond its source as
a volume through space and its effect far away. When the components are on the same line in an
equation, they are inversely proportional. So, D^10=D^4 (force) * Volume^2(D^6) ...Hence
gravitational force is inversely proportional to Volume^2= (D^3) ^2.

Other Equations for D^10 are as follows:

1.) D^10 = M^3*A/Density^2
2.) D^10 = A^4*Density^2*M^2
3.) D^10 = F*Volume^2
4.) D^10 = A^4*Density^4*Volme^2

D^11 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 11th dimension is gravitational force (D^7
or seventh dimension) in Four Dimensions (D^4) or Force. D^11 = D^8 * D^3 could be chemical
reaction in space that induces D^8.

D^12 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 12th dimension is Dimension 8 or nuclear
force acting in D^4 or Fourth Dimension or Force F. This F is also:

Gravity (D^7) and Kinetic Energy (D^5) = Magnetism (D^9) and Space (D^3).
Magnetism (D^9) = Gravity (D^7) * D2 = Gravity (D^7) * V^2T^2; T^2 Squared = Density or
Magnetism (D^9) = Gravity (D^7) * C^2 Squared * Density which implies that electricity can be
harvested from a gravitational field in vast quantities. There could be free energy in unlimited
amounts for all.

D^12 induces D^9 is Electricity inducing Magnetism respectively.

D^13 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT = Magnetism (D^9) * Force (D^4) which is
equivalent to electromagnetic force.

The dimensions keep rising and I suppose represent more complex and fundamental forces
acting at the subatomic level. The higher the dimension the greater the kinetic energy required in
the system. Kinetic Energy in the universe is rotational, and when transferred into linear motion
is great relative to our experience. But when contained in stable rotational paths, particles exist in
harmonious relationship at the subatomic level, and also in relation to planetary. Hence to take
matter and break it up in a supercollider is to go from higher dimensions (subatomic) to lower
dimensions (exo-atomic), the lowest particle is space fabric or D. So it may seem a waste of
energy to use high amounts of energy to bring us from high dimensional subatomic to the
smallest particle which is space or D of the 1st dimension. But I believe that is where the
analysis of supercollider will lead.

Dimension^23 would be

D^23 = E^4 (4th power) * D^3 or what I call the force of energy E^4 in the third dimension,
which perhaps might be the end of the periodic chart. This table leaves out the physics of
polarity, which includes antimatter and subsequent relationships opposite to the balance or
natural construct of nature that we experience in the universe of 23 dimensions. To discover
these polarities would be the door to time travel and anti-gravity. A black hole would be the most
complex arrangement of space at D^23 = E^4 * D^3, which means that D^23 = Gravity^2 * D^3.

This means to me that the amount of energy is increased by a power of 4, and gravity by the
power of 2. Gravity is accelerating in space and the resultant energy is enormous. The geometry
of space is accelerating into the black hole, and thus pulling the fabric of space (the medium
through which light travels) away from you. Hence it is black since the medium through which
light travels or space (D^3) is falling away faster than light moves through it to get out of the
black hole. There is order even in a black hole. We might assume that higher dimensions are
higher spatial densities. And so the dimensions progress from D^23 to D^1, in an ordered
relationship of physics, hence we can conclude that where there are generators of space, there are
black holes that generate space, maybe even in each atom, center of galaxy, and planet. The
universe is from singularity to singularity, from the singularity of D^1 to the infinite singularity
of D^23.

This universe is a particular qualification of infinity. And perhaps here the space matrix is in its
highest superposition and fractal pattern approaching infinity. This is either a point of fractal
subdivision toward infinity. Here E^4 = Gravity^2 or E^2 = Gravity. The very nature of a black
hole suggests that the space generated by its great mass at E^4 could be generating space and
gravitational field at a value square compared to a natural star.

Black Hole

A Black hole is the superposition of space in 23 dimensions. At this level, and as has been
discussed, the amount of energy is increased by a power of 4, and gravity by a power of 2. Hence
the normal manner of estimating gravity, generation of space, and energy has changed. Space has
compressed to limits where the strings that make up the matrix of space are in geometry of the highest compression and complexity. In three dimensional spaces the nodes of the geometry of
space are photons. The elastic collision of 3 dimensional spaces can be described as photonic
current similar to electricity. When this elasticity merges with space of a higher dimension, there
is some reflectivity at the boundary of two adjacent and different space dimensions. In the space
of a black hole there is no reflectivity and hence light is not apparently exiting or is trapped.

Hence the elasticity upon entering the space of a black hole is either super elastic or inelastic,
where the motion of current is totally absorbed. It is very possible as another option that the
conversion or superposition of space into 23 dimensions does not allow waves to exit with linear
reflectivity, but rather rotational motion, and hence the black hole appears black. It may be that
in a black hole the space matrix is approaching singularity and does not allow elastic collisions
of the space matrix to occur as in other lower dimensions.


By Dimension 4 I mean D^4 or D to the fourth power. Let’s say dimension 1 is a distance vector
or D^1. As a measurement let’s use meters.

D^5=MC^2........what we know as E..........calculate D for the Sun and you have the distance to
nearly Neptune, I prefer to understand D as the relationship of space or vector d to mass. So the
sun projects an umbrella of space to Neptune, after that, deep space is under the umbrella of
space that extends from the center of mass of our galaxy. So density of space varies.

D^10= E^2. I believe when you get to this level you are considering subatomic realities which
begin at D^5.

D^23=E^4 * D^3 so there is a lot of energy from 23 to 1. I'm not sure how many dimensions
there are, but this one seems tidy.


The periodic table of dimensions has recurring themes just as the periodic table of elements as

Dimension per Dimension

Here a VT is multiplied as you increase one D (VT) power in dimension.


There are qualities of the square of a component that repeat through the sequence of dimensions.

Groups of 5 and 3

D^1 power is line
D^2 power is area
D^3 power is volume
D^4 power is force
D^5 power is energy

This relationship of 1 to 5 involves interpretation of combinations of power according to
corresponding meaning. So gravity would have expression in these various magnitudes or
powers. The basis for the concept is line, area, volume, force, and energy and relationships
between these that include a concept such as density. So the concept of density can be expressed
again through the dimensions as a qualification of that dimension. Gravitational density and
electrical density are different and express different dimensions, but the similarity is an
expression of information in space. Thus the groups could show similarity in one of the
categories of 5 and every three from point or power of consideration. I left out 6 since it might be
covered better by the squared relationship. Dark energy is due to D, the primal superstring.

Group of 3 or Induction

Here we have higher dimensions inducing components of three dimensions lower. In the relation
of threes we also have similar characteristics grouped as Chemical/Space, Gravitational/Space,
and Electromagnetic/Space. There may be others.


There may be a relationship of velocity components vectors and rotational motion components
which I call induction by a factor of three dimensions from higher to lower dimension, although
there is also a relationship of lower to higher. So the higher dimensions induce lower dimensions
by a factor of three, related by rotational motion. There is a relationship between dimensions by
induction due to rotational motion. The dimensions of space energy matrix form relationships
due to rotational motion.

The relationship between D^9 (magnetism) and D^12 (electricity) is related by rotational motion
3 dimensions away and in an angular inductive relationship. From this there are projected
relationships between various dimensions such as:

1.) D^1 and D^4 or one dimensional vector VT (D^1) and the Fourth Dimension (D^4) or
Force; rotating space indices V and T. I believe acceleration is required for inducing V.

2.) D^2 and D^5 or 2nd dimension and Kinetic Energy or E (D^5).

3.) D^3 and D^6 or third dimension and magnetism, perhaps rotation motion in 3D relates
to magnetic fields. D^6 = space squared (D^3) ^2; space has a connection with electricity
and magnetism.

4.) D^4 and D^7 or Force and Gravity Density.

5.) D^5 and D^8 or Kinetic Energy and Nuclear Relationship

6.) D^6 and D^9 or Magnetism and Electricity and Space.

7.) D^7 and D^10 or Gravity Density and Electromagnetic Force or Gravity Energy (D^10):

According to this theory, gravity or D^7 is induced by D^10 or E^2. So motion of
electrons around a proton creates gravity. The idea of induction in my theory is that
rotation induces a vector, and a vector induces rotation. Gravity, for me conceptually,
must be the accumulation of many vectors to the center of a proton. The motion then of
an electron must be many circles orbiting a nucleus where the circles area or planar face
center is tangent to the nucleus. Would that be a helical orbit? The electron makes many
small circles as it orbits the nucleus, and each circle creates a vector of gravity (1
dimension) to the center of the nucleus. So perhaps the electron makes x amount of
circles while orbiting the nucleus. This motion induces accumulative vector of gravity to
the center. So the perceived effect of gravity is many vectors to the center, as in a
spherical action. This action must be additive with relation of on atom to another. Perhaps
by reversing the arrangement or reversing polarity, where the nucleus is an electron and
the orbiter is a proton, you might have an anti vector(s) of gravity. What I would do is
study mapping a helical orbit of small circles around a sphere to create a helical pattern
around a sphere. A computer would be good for that. After mapping geometry, I would
figure out a way to run protons around a central negative (electron) core in a helical
pattern and artificially reverse the construct of an atom. The generated field should
produce a crude antigravity vector outward. Once this is accomplished, it will not only
verify electron path and model of the atom, but could be refined in more subtle ways in
the future to produce floating spacecraft.

8.) D^8 and D^11 or Nuclear Relationship and Chemical Reaction.

9.) D^9 and D^12 or Electromagnetism and Electrical Density.

10.) D^10 and D^13 or Gravitational Energy and Nuclear Force.

The relationships continue to D^23. Within those are recurrent dimensional patterns. Circular or
rotational motion is steps in the direction of exploring inter dimensional induction, which is a
departure from Newtonian mechanics where static systems are explored.


The smallest particle-vector is space or D^1 and combined in various states to form all physical
elements, properties, and relationships. A photon could be the result of an elastic collision-wave
of the D particle matrix that transfers kinetic energy at the speed of light. There is no vacuum.
Hence it is hard to travel in a universe where you try to exceed the elastic collisions of the
matrix. It would be like trying to travel fast through water without tearing a hole in the medium
you are traveling in, the same is with space. As the density of space varies, the natural motions of
bodies are affected by the interaction of their space fields. Bodies generate space. Our planet is in
the umbrella of space created by our sun and the center of the galaxy. You will notice all
galaxies of space universe are evenly distributed by proportion to their size and the space they
generate. You have trouble exceeding the speed of the fastest event of the space matrix we know,
the elastic collision of the matrix in the phenomenon known as light.

Since light or a photon is the result of an elastic collision of the space matrix D, and because
crystal can bend light, we can assume that crystals can bend space. At first thought I would say
that a laser is compressed space, and that crystals can be used to compress and bend space. I
would be interested in the space compression experiment, to prove space can be manipulated
either by compression or rotation of objects. And that space can be altered by crystals suggest
that the universe might be a complex and fantastic hologram.

An experiment to measure the compression of space: In a vacuum do the following. Use crystals
to direct light into focused bands, which should be compressed space. Then send a particle
through it to see if its course is altered, whether by direction or velocity.

If a photon is a phenomenon that is a result of the elastic collision of space; and if a crystal can
bend light, then a crystal can bend space. Perhaps a laser is essentially elastic collisions in
compressed space. If Ron Mallet turns a laser in a spiral, the path is essentially bent or curved
space. That a crystal can bend space, time is induced by rotating space. This seems to agree with
Ronald Mallet’s idea of creating a laser beam circular path to create a time machine. In the
equations there is support for the idea since T^4 (rotation) induces T^1, well T^4 is essentially
what's in the third dimension or components thereof (space, momentum, density, time,
gravity)...Ronald Mallet may have something in his experiment. Although for the experiment to
be correct, space needs to bend the light. Bouncing light in a circle is not enough.

According to this theory, the speed of light is the speed of the elastic collision of the matrix of
space. A photon is the effect of the elastic collision of space. Space has a matrix or geometry,
and that matrix forms all things as it becomes denser in higher dimensions and more space
components are multiplied together. The particles we see such as electrons and other subatomic
particles are interference nodes in moving space, something like the interference waves on the
surface of the water. Now think of a motor boat on the water. At some point the water will not
allow the boat to pass without destroying the very medium of water it is passing through. So we
cannot travel faster than the matrix of space will allow an elastic collision in the same space or
the speed of light. Likewise in the water, the boat is limited by the medium of water, to the point
that if it tries to go too fast, it rips up the medium. Now the boat can go faster and at some point
by jumping above the surface of the water. I believe this same jumping is possible in space and is
the jump to hyperspace or dimension 4 (D^4). There is a balance in space between the
components of time and velocity, and this does not allow too much of one without sacrificing the
other, so there is entropy toward equilibrium in third dimension between time and velocity. But
there is also entropy between dimensions. The universe is a perpetual motion machine that
allows entropic action from equilibrium to disequilibrium and vice versa. And traveling fast to
the limits of this machine is in violation of the limits allowed in this perpetual motion. You
cannot break the clock, but you can transform through the clock. That is what traveling to
hyperspace is, and transformation above the matrix to where energy is allowing relatively to
motion at a higher rate.

Dimension 1 is singularity, the point, which is a projection from the infinite. Dimension 23 is the
infinite or circle or a black hole. So from the infinite you get the creation or projection of this
world to the point or singularity. The things of this world approach the infinite, but never quite make it (circle) because the energy to reach it is infinite. But look at it in reverse, the infinite
projects the finite to the point in the circle. The two are connected, and thus the universe is
infinite. And there is order even in a black hole. Nothing is chaos, everything is order. You can
travel any speed you want; all you need to know are the limits and dimensions of the mediums
through which you pass.

If you want to travel faster than the speed of light, you need a spaceship that can transform its
surface into 4 dimensions (D^4) while retaining three dimensions (D^3) internally. Hence in
dimension 4 (D^4) you are traveling relatively at the speed of light squared (C^2) compared to
this dimension. I just a few seconds in hyperspace you can travel to the center of the galaxy, and
maybe in 16 days for 16 billion light years. We are very limited to this solar system in our
present technology, but soon this will change. The Galaxy is much larger than we know, and
cannot be assessed with telescopes.

Space Matrix:

Space is a geometric matrix. A photon is the result of an elastic collision of the matrix nodes of
space. The photon does not travel just as an electron does not travel at the speed of light. The
elastic collision of the matrix travels at the speed of light and communicates the impulse to the
destination photon as is similar in electricity. The nodes of the three dimensional space matrix or
the overlap of intersecting string spin is the photon. This matrix is composed of three dimensions
of VT and the nodes of these three VT could be neutrinos electron, muon, and tau. These three
neutrinos combine to form a photon in three dimensional spaces. Hence space is the smallest
particle-wave construct. But the construct is transparent.

In the same manner that electricity provides energy via current and via elastic collisions, there is
a similar, but neutral current in operation in the solar system. The Sun generates elastic photon
collision through the space matrix to the planet earth. I might be feasible to create a completed
circuit that harnesses the photon current similar to electron current. This vast supply could be a
source of free energy for not only space travel, but to power all energy on the planet earth.

The interference pattern between waves “is” the construction of particle. However, it’s a space
wave or string node as opposed to an elastic collision wave. Imagine a jump rope, now 10 in a
line with a person spinning the rope on each side. Now imagine a cube for simplicity and people
with 6 hands. The stings are the rope which have spin and appear as a sphere. The people are the
photons or where the spheres overlap. When a wave or elastic collision hits the matrix, the
people or photons vibrate and that vibration through 10 ropes goes at the speed of light,
something like electricity, and the photon on the receiving end or person is what you see. This is
similar to a wave of current in a wire. When this space matrix spins on itself and superimposes
and its dimensional properties change, then you get an electron and other particles or nodes in
the space matrix and the strings slow down; and the electron is a heavier node than the previous
photon. But the lattices of space components that make up all particles or mass are from the same
primary space components. In reality I believe these spheres or strings overlap more than I have
indentified in my visual explanation. And also, At the most fundamental overlapping of these
spinning strings, the interference patterns which create space particles such as neutrinos and photons are transparent to other space densities. This allows further superposition that creates the
denser particle matter that we measure.

The speed of light represents a perfect elastic collision in the
matrix of space. This matrix is composed of strings which are
Distance, Time, and Velocity in negative, positive, and neutral.
Hence in three dimensions you have 3 x 3 x 3 = 27 superstrings
and the monopole or node of the matrix is the photon. Strings are
mathematical in relationship and form the construct of the
universe. What we see are the interference patterns of the spinning
strings and their active rotation in a spherical and three dimensional matrixes. The form of the
geometry is spiral such as in a toroid. The overlapping superstring form the photon in a three
dimensional tetrahedral and spherical geometry. What we see is the vibration of that matrix on
the receiving end of vision. But at the most minute level of the matrix, all is light.

In a perfect elastic collision energy is conserved; however, even after a long journey of billions
of miles through space light may seem to dim. Current theory accepts the dilemma of the double
slit experiment without clarification and assumes that the contradictions in current theory are
satisfactory to explain truth. A model that space has structure resolves the issue. Next time you
go to the beach, imagine that it is space, where the water is not moving to you are the speed of
water. Molecules collide to transmit kinetic energy. And so why would electrical or photonic
current (elastic collision) be the exception? The speed of light means elastic collision; unlike the
ocean space is a perfect elastic medium of which the photon is a constituent part. And if the
photon has no time, and is essentially everywhere, then the concept of structure makes sense.
The elastic wave of the light speed can decay due to the shift in space density or
creation/subtraction of space, or compression/expansion of space, but ideally the matrix is
elastic. The photon does not decay.

Now the double slit experiment:

If you see space as a fractal geometry or matrix, where a photon is the result of an elastic
collision along the matrix, or the transfer of kinetic energy, then you can resolve the conflict in
the experiment, that light is particle and wave. Light is kinetic energy transferred through the
matrix of space which is transferring motion? Yes, so the photon is an impulse with no mass,
except for the transfer of the kinetic energy which we detect. So this matrix is affected by optics
and barriers, and through the slit(s) kinetic energy is transferred depending on how the space
matrix is either blocked or distorted. Kinetic energy of an elastic collision can be diverted by as it
passes through slits or barriers. Any distortions in the matrix will affect the path of kinetic
motion. If you see the photon as “the effect” (light) of an elastic collision, and not the “product”
or light, you can resolve the duality of the experiment. Particles are the results of circular or spin
wave interference patterns, so what we see are the effects of the real component waves. That is
not to say that the universe is waves. It is composed of strings that are related in groups of multi
dimensions of space by motion, and the interference patterns are the particles we see. Hence
space creates matter, components, those things unseen are the substance that creates the particles
we see, and hence that is why there is so much more space than particles, because the relationships are established by dimension of space components. It may be that the interference
nodes or monopoles of the space matrix are “photons”, and the elastic collisions of these nodes
transfers the “light” in the same manner the elastic collision or electrons transfers the “electricity
in a wave at the speed of light. However, the photon does not traverse space, but the motion of
collision is at the speed of light. Hence the arrival of a photon is the arrival of a node of the
matrix on the receiving end.

The dual nature of light is the dual nature of the experiments. But the true nature of light is very
different. Light is a monopole of three dimensional space matrixes, which is a matrix and
superconductor. The dual nature is only the experiments that claim a dual nature; not the true
nature of light. All is infinite in the matrix of space and the monopole photon and you are but a
reference point. The matrix is also transparent to denser matrix forms, dimensions of space, and
heavier and slower interference patterns. As the interference patterns of the space matrix build,
particles result and motion slows to sub light speed. As particles acquire mass, their transparency
decreases. The discrepancy between quantum equations and relativity is that quantum described
the relationship of particles and relativity refers to the behavior of strings. Strings form the
matrix of space and the interference patterns due to rotation, superposition, and compression of
the matrix creates particles. So there are no particles, only an effect of the behavior of strings, a
shadow of the main event of string processes, or better expressed as a minute portion.

In the double slit, imagine space with nodes as in a structure that when you strike it, the vibration
of photons goes though the slits. So this explains the duality of wave and particle. The elastic
collision is the wave, and the transmission at the end of the vibration is the particle. The solution
is in the geometry, a lattice or matrix permeates and travels through the slits. In the model here as
in the double slit for the photon, what we measure is the effect, not the source. The photon is not
travelling through. The effect is travelling through communicated to the photons on the receiving

Light is neither a wave nor particle as we understand particles or waves, it is an elastic collision
in the matrix of space. It is a monopole (particle of interference or overlap pattern) of the matrix
of space, and in space the matrix is an elastic superconductor where the maximum transmission
of information is the speed of light. Photons have volume have mass from mass = D^3T^2.
Photons do not travel through space, but elastically collide as monopoles of the space matrix and
what you see are on the receiving end.


Entropy and the expansion of the universe are similar actions. The fabric of space limits motion
since it is difficult to exceed the limits of space or the speed of light. The retraction of the
universe is disentropy. Equilibrium or motion between entropy and disentropy that is established
between dimensions and the limits of motion that are permitted in each dimension by natural
occurrences results in perpetual motion. Entropy and the expansion of the universe are similar
actions. Disentropy and the retraction of the universe are also similar actions. The motion between entropy and disentropy is perpetual motion. The separation of matter due to entropy is
the expansion of space. The union of matter and retraction of space is disentropy. There is a limit
to the generation of space due to its relationship through dimensions (to 23 or Black hole) just as
there is a limit to motion relative to the speed of light. There is also a limit to the retraction of
space, which reverses and causes or explodes into an expansion. Balance and order exist, even in
a black hole. Closed systems cannot predict the function of the universe. Telescopes cannot
predict the size. The reality of entropy can only be expressed within a unified field theory.

Relationship of Mass and Space

Let us explore M=D^3 (cubed) T^2 (squared), so D is proportional to the cube root of the mass.
By this relationship we know that space is in relationship to mass by the cube root. So for a mass
125, cube root is 5; now half the mass to 62.5 each, and take cube root of each, and you will have
4 and 4 which is 8. So in the explosion of a galaxy, when you half the mass of a single bodied
system, you nearly double the space and probably by a factor of C^2 squared. The relationship of
mass and space and gravity is illustrated.

The other point I would like to make about space is that there is a ratio of matter to space. The 2
have a symbiotic relationship. Matter does not exist in space, but the two create one another. So
at the creation of the universe or big bang, as the pieces separated, or matter separated, you get a
doubling of space every time the amount of matter breaks into 2 halves. And you perhaps get
spaces adding to one another, as gravity does. So with many pieces, you get quite an acceleration
of space. Recently science has discovered that the universe is accelerating outwards, and that it is
caused by an "invisible energy", what I presume in my theory proposed to be space itself and its
relation to matter. But as matter comes together and forms a black hole with increasing gravity,
you have the reduction of space.

An equation explaining the relationship of space to mass is D^3 (cubed) T^2 (squared) = mass,
so mass is related to space by the cube root. This means that if you half the mass, you more than
double the space, perhaps multiplied by some constant. That may explain the ratio of mass to
space in the universe. So an exploding star would create vast amounts of space, while a black
hole would diminish space.

D is the smallest particle or component. Let us use string terminology to describe D. D is a string
from which everything is made. I would rather say that each dimension is made of vector that
combines v and t. Just like we add electrons in the periodic table which is also similar to addition
and subtraction, the universe is multiplication. Each dimension adds 2 vectors of V and T, which
results in D. Now in three dimensions, you have three vectors. Now you ask, what does it mean,
that’s what is so incredible about the whole thing, these vectors combine to form matter, gravity;
things upon observation seem totally unrelated. How can you jump 4 dimensions from D^3 and
have D^7 or gravity?....well think of molecules and how different they are just to add an electron
(addition), but now instead of addition, multiplication. So now in our third dimension you have
a matrix of D in three directions, and the elastic collision of that matrix is a photon. If a crystal
can bend it, then it must be like a fantastic hologram. What super colliders will find if they could
is D, V, and T, the basic components of all construction.

What I understood by the M = D^3 * T^2 = Space * first I thought that D or the
vector component of d or space related to mass was influenced by the cube root. So my
interpretation was that if you had a star, and it exploded into 2 pieces, you would more than
double the space. So if there was a big bang, the acceleration of space or expansion of it was a
mighty unfolding. Mass is a relationship to space and density (T^2). Half the mass or a large
object into two separate pieces, more than doubles the space.

Another equation more accurately explains the distance of space surrounding a mass:

D = Root to 5th (MC^2 squared).

If you calculate the mass of the sun and solve D, the distance for space D is just inside or short of
Neptune. Note that planets beyond Neptune have a more eccentric orbit and not orbiting in the
same plane as other planets. Take for example Pluto. As Pluto escapes the umbrella of space
generated by the Sun, it travels through less dense space, and thus the path of Pluto is more
eccentric, deviated from the ecliptic plane, and asymmetric about the Sun, caused by moving
through a medium of space of varying density. Our solar system must be in the umbrella of space
caused by the center of our galaxy or Milky Way. So a planet such as Neptune is affected by
space matrixes from the center of the galaxy, from the sun, and that space generated by it and
interacting with other spaces. So for any particular piece of matter space is infinite, since you can
never travel to the limit of space that is generated since you are at the center. Space itself must be
the dark matter that keeps galaxies apart and in equilibrium or evenly distributed in space. Of
course smaller matter would have more freedom to move between the larger generators of space.
Also, it may be more difficult to travel between galactic space generators as in the thin space
areas between them, where space may be more distorted rather than homogeneous as in our solar
system. Due to rotational; motion of bodies, space has many twists in addition to varying density.

Sun & Orbits

In the theory of space generation, if mass generates space, then the sun with a mass of
2*10(30thpower), and C plugged into the equation D (5th) = 5th power cube root of (mc
(squared)) = a distance of 3 x 10 (9th power), which is the space generation of the Sun. Neptune
is just on the edge of this at 4.5 (9th power). After Neptune, outer solar orbits such as Pluto show
more deviation from the ecliptic and asymmetry in orbit, where the layers of space thin out and
vary density. You are under an umbrella of the center of the galaxy at Pluto. So Pluto travels
through light and dense space matrix/matter, in and out of our sun's umbrella. From this you
might assume well, should not the space of the sun extend further out to include Neptune in a
model of planets in the space of the sun aligned within the plane of the ecliptic? Well, maybe the
sun's mass is a bit more, or maybe it was at one time but has expended this via nuclear fusion,
and Neptune is in a stable space density zone now for some time since its original orbit. When I
refer to eccentricity of planets beyond Neptune being more eccentric, beginning with Neptune, I
refer to the "deviation from the ecliptic plane" and asymmetry in orbit. What I am trying to
convey is that a less dense space does affect orbits differently. In the case of Mercury, it is very
possible that the compression of space close to the sun is also affecting its orbit at the opposite
extreme, space there is more distorted. Compression and expansion of space due to density, a
concept not even considered, affected by its originator, and the spin of the source.

It could be that the eccentricities of Neptune and Mercury are also due to variations in space
density, the density being greater near the Sun. Deviation from the ecliptic and asymmetry in
orbit are results of lighter space density bordering greater space density. Neptune orbit begins to
be more asymmetric to a center. Neptune is within the limit however believe its orbit was
established when the sun had more mass, and is now receding and effecting its orbit slowly.
Beyond Neptune orbits get wild.

Every component of the universe can be explained by other components, so you can equate any
component of physics to others components. Hence you have a Trans-Dimensional Unified Field
theory to explain all these relationships.

Motion & Density

Space by these equations is proportionately related to motion and density.
Note the following:

1.) D= (Cube root) of M/T^2 (squared)
2.) Acceleration * Density = D
3.) Force/D^3 (cubed) = D

It could be that spaces generated by various bodies are additive and overlap as gravity is
additive. Hence there are different densities of space surrounding and in the path of different
planetary bodies. This could explain the eccentric, asymmetric, and a-ecliptic orbits of planets,
where more eccentric, asymmetric, and a-ecliptic orbits result from greater fluctuations in space
density in the orbital path. Perhaps Pluto's orbital path is the least homogeneous.

Space Density

In the theory discussed, mass generates space. The space created by the sun is just up to Neptune.
The space beyond is covered by the center of the galaxy, so it is less dense. It may be that
planetary bodies prefer to exist in areas of greater space density. So in a sense, the
counterbalance to entropy is found where the dispersal of energy is reversed. So we see the result
as a spiral galaxy where bodies tend to concentrate in spiraling arms from the center of the
galaxy in arms of greater space density. It may be easier to travel in areas of greater space
density, which is opposite to our normal thinking of traveling through higher densities. As the
galaxy spins about its center and pulls its space, the resultant effect is a spiral from its center.

Entropic inertia keeps the forms in spiral rather than circles with condensed bands of space.

According to this theory, planets or bodies create space. The density of space varies. So the sun
creates an umbrella of space just short of Neptune from the equation D^5 = MC^2 squared,
Einstein left out D^5 to the 5th. So the center of our galaxy creates space that passes through our
solar system. The density of space varies. Maybe that explains why the orbit of bodies is more
asymmetric from Neptune to beyond. Think of an object traveling from oil into air. If all things
are related, why not space. I'm thinking that the smallest particle is space. So the things affecting
planetary orbits are multiple, to include the fabric of space itself. This also could explain why objects exiting our solar system into deep space diverge in their paths because the gravity of
other celestial objects could affect them differently in a different space density. Gravity
equations will have to be altered to include space density.

It is possible that early in the evolution of the solar system, the space generated by our sun was a
bit further away than Neptune and perhaps just beyond Pluto, but has slowly been receding. It
may be that the shift is space density from a higher density of our solar system to a lower density
of interstellar space is also responsible for the creation of the heliosphere. This area of “spacedensity”
transition would create a transitional density zone between solar space and interstellar

Each dimension of space is a different field or matrix type of space. The monopoles of that space
matrix are different. It could be that the space from different celestial generators overlap
affecting the dimension of space, such as the space of D^3. Also the space of a gravitational field
of a higher dimensional matrix may blend with the space of D^3. Hence the density of space may
vary according to blend of different space matrixes and types. And the extension of these spaces
from the celestial generators may also vary. Hence the reality of space may be a complex blend
of densities and matrixes of the same and different types. Since these matrixes are transparent to
the human eyes, we perceive space as homogeneous energy field which it is not.

Definition of the Atom, Gravity and Mass

F=Magnetism/D^2 (squared) = MA = D^4 (forth power)

Gravity Force Vector = (MAGNETISM)*D = F*D^3 (cubed).........The idea of gravity intrigued
me. It is true that an atom does not exert a magnetic field, which is a mystery, but I claim that it
does, but the nature of it being one dimensional and this is expressed as gravity in my opinion.
Hence the connection to electromagnetism is discovered in the atom. And perhaps to recreate the
mechanism of the atom would actually create a gravity generating device, and once this was
understood, the counter principle could be engineered to create a gravitational field of opposite
polarity. Maybe this is what flying saucers use. From the equation we have determined the
relationship of magnetism and gravity. Gravity is the result of magnetism acting as a one
dimensional vector. Since all atoms each exert gravity, we have to look to the atom and see what
component of the atom generates a magnetic field restricted to a single vector or point. Since
moving electrons create a magnetic field, we can assume that magnetism is caused in each atom
but restricted to a 1 dimensional component by the moving electron (s) proton interaction. This
magnetic field, restricted by its interaction with the positive proton and in one dimension, is the
gravitational component. Hence, gravity is magnetism, but of Dimension 1. By this we can now
know how to create a machine that can create gravity. We need to map the path of an electron
around a nucleus, and create a machine with electric current that does the same, but of greater
magnitude. And also, the reverse of such a process in polarity would be to create an antigravitational
field. A reverse in polarity means a reverse in the direction of gravitational vector
or field. A reverse in polarity would then be a reverse in the relationship of orbiting charge.

According to this theory, the smallest particle is space and a photon is the result of an elastic
collision along the matrix of space. Photon nodes collide to transfer the collision wave and the effect is light, but light is not a traveling substance much like electricity. Hence you have a
particle and a wave, the elastic collision being the particle, and the matrix of space the wave. But
since the matrix of space is transparent (penetrating all matter), it can be bent and turned such is
the phenomena of light. The fastest speed that the collision can occur is the speed of light. So it
is hard to travel faster than the matrix of space will allow without disturbing it. Space represents
the smallest dimension (1) and particle. As relationships build to 23 dimensions, you get
subatomic forces and particles of great energy. No wonder a supercollider has to work so hard, to
transform 23 dimensions into 1, is it possible, isn't it comical to look for what is in front of you
already? The relationship of complex geometric/dimensional structure allows far less flexibility
at high dimensions such as 23 dimensions (at the subatomic level) than at low level exoatomic
level of space. Hence you get the behavior of atoms attracting and repelling to conform within
the limits of the subatomic parameter dimension of high order.

Time & Time Travel

I am exploring time. To me it appears a velocity. 5 dimensions of time are resulting in mass. In
the space time we have 3 vectors of time. We measure our clocks with 1 dimension. M=D^3
(cubed) T^2 (squared) =V^3 (cubed) T^5 (5th power). T^2 Squared = Density

T^1 = Time = (MV) D^3 cubed / Gravity (D^7). Density means time is defined by momentum in
three dimensions divided by gravity. Hence momentum, space and gravity define time. So to
increase T directly or by induction would increase momentum, speed up time, and reduce
gravity. So a spinning ball (high rpm) would rise faster and fall faster than a non spinning ball.

T^2 = Time^2 Squared = Density

T^3 = T in 3rd dimension, but we measure T. But in D^3 there are three vectors or superstrings
of T.

Gravity (density) = V^7 seventh x T^7 seventh = D^7 seventh. Now take a limit of C and
Time = seventh root of G/C = seventh root of G/V, where G approaches 1 and hence T = V
So, time is nearly a velocity, inversely proportional, but in some instances equivalent.
T=D/V; T=D/C, and so at the speed of light time approaches 0.

Future time travel or forward time travel

Where the gravity is greater than 1, time decreases with velocity, but at the subatomic level
(higher dimension such as 4th or 5th dimension) where gravity is less than 1, time speeds up or
the reverse happens relatively. So, the implications for time travel exist, but in such a scenario,
time is moving forward, as in a river, with slow boats and fast boats. Time travel in the reverse
would work in a physics that is working in reverse. This would exist particularly in the physics
of polarity yet to be discovered in the area of antigravity and antimatter. However, the actual
existence in such a dimension may be impossible. There is a crossing point where time and
velocity are equivalent between exo and subatomic worlds. In the exo world or our world, when
you speed up, time slows down relatively, this is known. At the subatomic level, when you speed up, time speeds up relatively or faster into the future according the equations. This means a leap
into a higher dimension can propel you into a faster time rate, such as faster than light travel or
hyperspace. This is discussed in further detail at T4 (time to 4th power) below.

Past Time Travel

Time travel into the past would require traveling in dimension of polarity. In the case of polarity
in the exo world or polar exo world, you are traveling back in time. As you speed up in the polar
exo world, time goes back slower, and at the subatomic exo world, time is faster as it moves
backwards; both scenarios are moving backwards in time and opposite to our normal world (exo
and subatomic). So a spaceship, to time travel to the past if possible, has to enter polarity at
a lower dimension (polar exoatomic or 3rd dimension like our own) for normal time or at
a higher subatomic dimension for faster hyper time (opposite to here). So the ship must have the
capability to enter exo polarity at a lower dimension and move to a higher dimension to go
backwards faster, but return via higher "normal" subatomic dimension to speed forward. The
question is how effective is the time spread involving inter-dimensional travel, meaning, how
fast can you move back or forward or backward in hyperspace; and of course, traveling via other
dimensions, the time displacement will be different. This is complicated physics and requiring
much advancement in the relative motion of different dimension, or more exactly relative time T,
distance D, and velocity V. You may not be able to travel in a polar dimension. I do not believe
there are any paradoxes in physics or time. Time is a velocity, like a river, with motion or a
motion picture. The river has a destination, and you can ride a boat to the destination to the point
that you departed, going forward seems to be unknown. If there is a loop back, it is just that, still
a part of the river.

Time travel can be induced because Time can be induced.

By principle of induction T^4 (4th power) induces T^1 (1st power)

T^4 = T * Density * (MV) D^3 cubed/Gravity Force (D^4); a relationship construct of these in
velocity and rotational motion will induce time (T). Space is constructed by the smallest particle
D. And a photon is an elastic collision along the matrix of space, at the speed of light, which is
the limit for the matrix of space. Can the galaxies expand faster than the speed of light? Or a
better question is can space expand faster than the elastic collisions it allows? No, since we
would not detect the phenomenon of light under these conditions. Since space permeates or
passes through everything, it is pliable. Since it is possible to redirect light through a prism, we
can assume that space elastic collisions are directionally altered in a prism. The control of light is
the bending, compression, or turning of space and redirection of the elastic collisions that are
taking place. Thus, by principle of induction, we can rotate space by rotating light in the third
dimension, and induce a vector or component of time. Hence this could be a possible method of
inducing time travel. Not the equation also implies other events. The rotation of space not only
involves the induction of time, but 1/gravity which could be a polarity of anti gravity. The
bending of space could induce not only time, but anti gravity. This has nothing to do with
photons, but the photons can show the direction of space since photons demonstrate or are the
elastic collision of space. Reference the T^1 equation above. There are multiple dimensions in
each super string D, T, and V.

Other possibilities

T^4 = Density Squared, a fluctuation in the density of space will induce T.
T^4 = D^4/V^4=D^4/C^4; at the speed of light T^4 = Force or fourth dimension (D^4) which
might me the portal for time travel. Since the distances are so great in the galaxy, time travel may
be necessary to get around. Perhaps time as we see it is different from what it really is.
T^4 = Space (D^3) * M * Density/Magnetism (D^6); manipulation of magnetic construction of
space will vary the density of space and time.

Relative Time, Inter-Dimensional Travel

In T^4, time would be flowing at C^2 squared compared to the 3rd dimension. Since by adding a
VT to the next higher dimension you square or add a power to the result of time, velocity, and
distance. So 3x10 to the 8th power kilometers for 1 second of time of light speed would be 9x10
to 16th power kilometers for 1 second of time in 4th dimension (hyperspace) relative to the 3rd
dimension, and this would even magnify to another power or C^3 for the 5th dimension of
hyperspace. So flying a spaceship into the fourth dimension in an instance you would travel
across the galaxy. So an adjustment of relative time in hyperspace 4th dimension would result in
vast jump in space on the 3rd dimension. Adjusting relative motion in hyperspace or 4th
dimension would also be an issue of time travel, since I believe adjustment of motion faster
would push you forward in time, and slowing down perhaps backward, but I doubt the backward
component since I believe all things move forward. The key moving forward would be
to maintain relative velocity to freeze relative time; and to slightly adjust relative time to affect a
change is distance travel. Or by adjusting relative distance travel without adjusting relative
motion, that would affect relative time travel. Hence time would adjust distance, velocity would
adjust time, relatively speaking. And of course the ship would have to be transformed
magnetically on the exterior to conform to a multidimensional matrix.


According to this theory, 1 second in hyperspace (4th dimension) is equivalent to 10,000 light
years away in travel. The Milky Way galaxy is 100,000 light years in diameter and 1000 light
years thick. So travel across our galaxy would be 10 seconds. Now the horizon of the visible
universe is 14 billion light years away, so in the 4th dimension, travel would be 1400000 seconds
or 388.88 hours or 16 days in hyperspace. Multidimensional travel is definitely the way to
traverse space. It wouldn't surprise me if the universe is much larger. I’ve heard recently that
Hubble saw a horizon of 76 billion light years; it would not surprise me if it was 1 billion times

Time adjusts Distance in hyperspace.
Velocity adjusts Time in hyperspace.

I prefer the concept of time travel to the past being possible by concept of polarity where the
motion of time is naturally reversed if possible at all.

When you think of breaking the speed of sound, you have broken one, sound and air, but still are
traveling in another medium, space. What happens when you pass the speed of a medium, and
then there is none left behind it? Well, then you cannot. You cannot travel faster than the speed
of light of the medium or space. With relationship to the speed of light, to exceed you need to
disappear to the 4th dimension or hyperspace where time varies distance and velocity varies time
relative to the 3rd dimension. So before you ever break the barrier, you are going to bounce to
hyperspace. In this hyperspace your relativistic connection to your home dimension is drastically
altered and will involve huge displacements of position, time, and velocity. So much so that the
first explorers may in fact be lost in time.

Want to know more?...

Click here to read the entire theory by George James Ducas.